Drawing for BEST PRACTICES

USPTO serial 74677988

BEST PRACTICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BEST PRACTICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clifton Ted Hunt

POST OFFICE BOX 15039CHARLOTTE, NC 28211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer business software for distribution, ordering, management and preventive maintenance of parts and industrial equipment for the following type companies, namely, companies dealing in over the road trucks, construction and mining equipment, material handling equipment, marine, automotive, aircraft, aerospace, engines, generators, HVAC, electronic equipment, electro-mechanical equipment, mechanical equipmentABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 1997ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 28, 1997CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED
May 12, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 7, 1997IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Nov 12, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 4, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 18, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 1996ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 29, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Oct 12, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance