USPTO serial 74678030
#833
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with #833?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Browne
ROBERT E BROWNE VEDDER, PRICE, KAUFMAN & KAMMHOLZ222 N LASALLE STSTE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of marketing and promotional information for others via portable telephone | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 15, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 2, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 4, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |