USPTO serial 74678086
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M LUCASH
RICHARD M LUCASH LUCASH GESMER & UPDEGROVE LLP40 BROAD STBOSTON, MA 02109-4307UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | museums, including a Boston tea party ship and museum, and aquariums which offer active participation in events and attractions | ABANDONED | Sep 3, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |