USPTO serial 74686936
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Dergosits
MICHAEL E DERGOSITS DERGOSITS & NOAH LLPFOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 1150SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | quick reference books, booklets, pamphlets, guides, do-it-yourself books and manuals all in the field of computer hardware and software, telephony, travel, sports, health, building construction, languages, and cooking | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 1996 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |