USPTO serial 74687688
FUJI ELECTRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUJI ELECTRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JP
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | photosensitive, photoconductive drums for electrophotography in connection with copying machines | ACTIVE | Mar 17, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 4, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 15, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 21, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |