USPTO serial 74688864
SUPERELASTICBUBBLEPLASTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TOLPIN, BRETT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPERELASTICBUBBLEPLASTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westbury, NY
Westbury, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James David Jacobs
JAMES DAVID JACOBS BAKER & MCKENZIEJACOBS805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | plastic toy consisting of an air tube and a compound used together to make bubbles, which toy air tube and toy compound can be sold as a unit or separately | ACTIVE | Nov 16, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |