USPTO serial 74690127
SMART FILING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART FILING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Ohta-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brunet
WILLIAM J BRUNET FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEKELLER PLZ 38TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | filing system, namely, copying machines, image data processing apparatus, interface boards, magneto optical disk drives and computer software for managing imaging functions | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |