USPTO serial 74708659
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen W. Feingold, Cecelia Kehoe Dempsey, Kelly E.P. Flatt, Richard D. Harris, Peter Katz, Gerald E. Levy, Marc A. Lieberstein, James A. Lovensheimer, Elyse A. Marcus and David A Swerdloff
STEPHEN W FEINGOLD PITNEY HARDIN LLP7 TIMES SQ 20TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely,[ amusement arcades; casino facilities;] distribution of television programming to cable television stations; [entertainment exhibitions, namely, live entertainment in the nature of musical groups, comedy, dance, and traditional stage plays and performing acts;] production of videotape; and production of radio and television programs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 12, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |