USPTO serial 74718074
QUICKNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2288335Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 26, 1999
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with QUICKNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5J8, CA
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5J8, CA
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5J8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING GREENBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR 255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4728UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for providing access to extracts from news source databases and bulletin boards, newspapers, wireservices, broadcasts and related news services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Providing telecommunications connections to computer databases and computer software systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Consulting services pertaining to the use of databases, word processing and electronic mail | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QL SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by QL SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by QL SYSTEMS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUICKNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |