USPTO serial 74718683
PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACIFIC COMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maribeth R. Evans
MARIBETH R EVANS PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP130 KEARNY ST ROOM 3609SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others via the preparation of advertisements and listings and consulting related thereto, and placing such advertisements and listings in publications and electronic transmission services; managing telecommunications and cable television systems and equipment for others; telephone directory information services; promoting the goods and services of others through issuance of award of purchase points delivered, stored and discharged by electronic means for consumer interactive and non-interactive participation in multimedia games, contests and purchase incentive promotions; business management consultation services; billing services and statistical information services; data processing services in the field of communications; and computer information storage and retrieval services for advertisers, the telecommunications industry and consumers for consumer interactive and non-interactive multimedia purchase incentive and multimedia participation programs | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |