USPTO serial 74720802
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
San Francisco, CA
INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by INTERNATIONAL THINKLINK CORPORATION
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD J. MILSTEIN
HAROLD J MILSTEIN HELLER EHRMAN WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | credit card transaction processing services for merchandise and services purchased via telephone or over a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 1995 |
| 038 | interactive communication services, namely, providing telecommunications services to individuals and businesses via computer and/or telephonic interfaces, namely, personal communication services, electronic transmission of messages and data, transmission and receipt of data, voice, facsimile, electronic mail, voice mail, fax mail; local and long distance telephone service; audio and video teleconferecing services; and telephone gateway services in the nature of providing a link to the global computer communication network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 22, 1995 |
| 042 | hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; computer services, namely, providing databases featuring general and local news and information of interest to specific geographic areas; computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, chat rooms providing on-line facilities for real-time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 1997 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |