USPTO serial 74722212
D-CHEQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D-CHEQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Willowdale, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet M. Fuhrer
JANET M FUHRER FRASER & BEATTY180 ELGIN ST STE 1200OTTAWA, ON K2P 2K7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for automating the production, delivery, authentication and processing of documents for invoicing, electronic funds transfer, electronic payments, namely electronic processing and transmission of bill payments, and accessing commercial financial accounts and executing transactions in those accounts, and user manuals therefor | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | electronic funds transfer service which provides automated production, delivery, authentication and processing of documents for invoicing, electronic funds transfer, electronic payments, namely electronic processing and transmission of bill payments, and accessing commercial financial accounts and executing transactions in those accounts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |