USPTO serial 74722951
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LONDON, GB
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
CONSOLIDATED DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED
LONDON, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M.C. Farrelly
Catherine M.C. Farrelly Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz28 Liberty StreetNew York, NY 10005| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | services for providing multi-user access to a global computer network for the transfer and dissemination of information; services for creating, sending, receiving and storing electronic mail on a global computer network; services for creating, sending, receiving and storing audio and video on a global computer network; computer telecommunications connectivity services; and services for providing multi-user computer teleconferencing for the transfer of audio and video on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer web site hosting services; computer security services for computers with access to a global computer network; computer consulting services related to the use of and access to a global computer network; computer network operations services; computer system administration services; services for the design, implementation, and management of computer networks for use with a global computer network; workstation and server configuration and maintenance services for computer systems with access to a global computer network; and services related to the registration and use of domain names on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2020 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 28, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 30, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |