Drawing for ERAMET

USPTO serial 74725550

ERAMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLE RICHARD G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERAMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H. John Campaign

H JOHN CAMPAIGN GRAHAM, CAMPAIGN & MCCARTHY, PCTHE BAR BLDG36 W 44TH STNEW YORK, NY 10036-8178

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006common metals and their alloys, namely, high speed steels, plats, squares and bars made of high speed steels, tools made of high speed steels, quality tools for handy man, punches, dies for forming, shaping and cold extrusion made from high speed steels, replaceable components such as diesel engine nozzle needles and injection pump cams or certain parts of hydraulic pumps made of high speed steels, refractory alloys and high strength alloys mainly in sheet form; non-electric metal cables and wires; non-electric metal locks; metal piping; metal safes; metal oresABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 25, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jun 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 4, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 19961.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
Apr 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance