USPTO serial 74725865
SLAP STIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIH, SALLY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SLAP STIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANDRINGHAM, VICTORIA, 3191, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
M. Iris Hess
M IRIS HESS LADAS & PARRY5670 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2100LOS ANGELES, CA 90036-5679UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | adhesive and non-adhesive labels, namely, printed labels, partially printed labels, and blank labels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |