USPTO serial 74726276
CERTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CERTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Doncaster, DN4 8DG, South Yorkshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Judith Sapp
JUDITH SAPP MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1800 M ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5869UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | ropes, cables, wires and strands, all of common metal; barbed wire, wire fencing, wire netting; terminals of common metal for use with wire, strands, cables and ropes; fittings made of common metal for use with wire, strand, cable and rope | ACTIVE | — |
| 022 | rope and strand made of natural material; rope and strand of synthetic materials; fittings of natural or synthetic material for use with rope and strand; nets and harness made of natural or synthetic fibre | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | rental of lifting apparatus; installation, repair and maintenance of lifting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |