USPTO serial 74734922
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Marsh
ROBERT E MARSH BLACKWELL SANDERS MATHENY WEARY, ET ALTWO PERSHING SQ2300 MAIN STE 1100KANSAS CITY, MO 64108| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | safety devices to detect and sound an alarm in the event of unauthorized home intrusion, health and safety emergencies or the accumulation of smoke or harmful levels of gasses | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |