USPTO serial 74800208
MEPHISTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEPHISTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LUGGAGE OR GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, TRUNKS, SUITCASES, LEATHER SUITCASES, IMITATION LEATHER SUITCASES, HANDBAGS, BEACH BAGS, SADDLERY AND CAMPING BAGS, NAMELY--ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, KNAPSACKS, RUCKSACKS AND BACKPACKS | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | GYMNASTIC EXERCISE AND SPORTS ARTICLES, NAMELY--PLAYING BALLS, BOWLING GAMES, GOLFING STICKS, GOLF CLUBS AND BAGS FOR GOLF CLUBS; EQUIPMENT SOLD AS A UNIT FOR PLAYING A BOWLING GAME | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1992 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1988 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 19, 1988 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 1988 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 1988 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1987 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |