Drawing for ERECTOR

USPTO serial 74800247

ERECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ERECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald P. Kananen

RONALD P KANANEN MARKS MURASE & WHITESTE 7502001 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007conveyors made of metallic pipe, covered with synthetic resinABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 1993ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 15, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 14, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 20, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 6, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 1, 1991DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 1, 1991DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 3, 1991ZZZZALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 8, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 1991CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 24, 1990CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 15, 1990CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 1990CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Aug 7, 1989CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 25, 1989CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 7, 1989UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 23, 1989CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 1989DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance