USPTO serial 74800333
CAIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1834505Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 3, 1994
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CAIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Moriguchi City, Osaka 570, JP
Moriguchi City, Osaka 570, JP
Moriguchi City, Osaka, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELVIN C. GARNER
MELVIN C GARNER DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuit | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 30, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 4, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 22, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1990 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1989 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1989 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 1988 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1988 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |