USPTO serial 74800393
SEVEN SUMMITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEVEN SUMMITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID J. KERA
DAVID J KERA OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, ET AL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYFOURTH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | AMUSEMENT PARK SERVICES; BOOK PUBLICATION SERVICES; MOVIE STUDIO SERVICES; PHYSICAL EDUCATION SERVICES; GOLF AND SKI RESORT SERVICES; PROVIDING TENNIS COURT AND SWIMMING POOL FACILITIES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 11, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1990 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1990 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 9, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1989 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |