USPTO serial 74800407
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN PROGOFF
KATHERINE BLAUKOPF JONES APPAREL GROUP, INC39TH FL LEGAL DEPT1411 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10018| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, SWEATERS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, VESTS, JUMPSUITS, AND ROMPERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 15, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2004 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 13, 1993 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1993 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1992 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1991 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 31, 1991 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 1991 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 23, 1991 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1991 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1990 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 7, 1990 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1990 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 20, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |