USPTO serial 74800979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Burlington, MA
Burlington, MA
Burlington, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kerry L. Timbers
KERRY L TIMBERS BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer programming for others provided in a limited channel of trade, namely, programming provided in connection with consulting services in the field of business, financial, manufacturing and distribution management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 11, 1984 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |