USPTO serial 74801190
ULTRA MAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODPASTER, SCOTT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRA MAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HAROLD I. KAPLAN
HAROLD I KAPLAN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | tee-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, pants, sweaters, jackets, coats, swimwear and belts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 29, 1992 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 20, 1992 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1991 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 15, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 1990 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1990 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1990 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |