USPTO serial 74801433
ADONIS EXCLUSIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNELIUS, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADONIS EXCLUSIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol Lilienfeld
URSULA B DAY60 E 8TH STNEW YORK, NY 10003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | belts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JACKSON INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY KURT D. BRUHL Gesellschaft m.b.H. & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by JACKSON INTERNATIONAL TRADING COMPANY KURT D. BRUHL Gesellschaft m.b.H. & CO. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ADONIS EXCLUSIVE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 31, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 23, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 8, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |