USPTO serial 74801453
OINKERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OINKERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5P 3H3, CA
Toronto, Ontario, M5P 3H3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W. MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVESTE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | visors; sweat bands; golf shirts; track pants; toques; swimwear; sweatsuits; hosiery; hats; underwear; belts; socks; scarves; chef hats; pajamas; lingerie; nose warmers; ear muffs; caps; bathing suits; shirts; aprons; T-shirts; footwear; namely, men's, women's and children's casual shoes, sports shoes and slippers; infant clothing; namely, bibs, jumpers, pajamas, socks, and dresses | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 5, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 4, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1990 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 15, 1990 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 1990 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 1990 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1990 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 1989 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1989 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 1989 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |