USPTO serial 75000889
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mission Management Information Systems Inc. and Randy S. Wilson Joint Venture, The
Niagara Falls, Ontario, CA
MISSION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC.
Niagra Falls, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MISSION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC.
MISSION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC.
Niagra Falls, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by MISSION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOROTHY A STREUTKER
DOROTHY A STREUTKER STEINHART & FALCONER333 MARKET ST STE 3200SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs and manuals sold therewith used to book lodging reservations and process information related thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 17, 1998 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |