USPTO serial 75001942
LIFESTYLE TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIFESTYLE TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY, BAUERSFELD & LOWRY6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | heuristics-based artificial intelligence home and building automation systems comprised of computer hardware, computer interfaces, computer software, namely, software to interface with and control sensors, detectors, microphones, cameras, monitoring devices, actuators, switches and controllers, computers featuring voice recognition capability and digitized speech, computerized weather monitors, finger, voice, hand and face recognition systems comprising computer hardware, monoptic and stereoptic object-recognition software, and facial characteristic-recognition software, and electronic components relating thereto, namely, embedded IC chips and circuits, video and audio controls and transmitters, unidirectional and bidirectional infrared transmitters and receivers, bidirectional radio frequency data transmitters and receivers, two-way wireless receivers and transmitters, indoor temperature and humidity detectors and control devices to adjust temperature and humidity, dimmer switches, light sensors, electrical cables and connectors, data cables and connectors, gender changers, power supplies, AC/DC converters, battery chargers, ion transfer batteries, polymorphic batteries, peel-and-stick batteries, intelligent batteries, electrical couplers, data couplers, video connectors, contact switches, electric power plugs, network video control panels, touch-screen display panels, TMOS flat-screen display panels, wall panel displays, computer monitors, computer software-generated screen displays, computer/electronic key pads, computer/electronic switchboards, electric line splitters, computer key labels, wireless remote controls, network modulators and demodulators, irrigation sensors, sprinkler relays, electronic ozone generators, high-definition television, optical scanners, thermostats, light switches, PBX switches, sirens, alarm-signaling devices, and intelligent sensors and controllers; and vacuum cleaning system comprising in-wall or floor ducts, and a central motorized suction system | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | domestic cooking ovens; lamps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |