USPTO serial 75008709
LA CORONA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LA CORONA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Thomas
CHARLES H THOMAS CISLO & THOMAS4201 LONG BEACH BLVD STE 405LONG BEACH, CA 90807-2007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed whole jalapenos, sliced jalapenos, corn oil, processed black beans, lentils, red beans, garbanzos, and pinto beans | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1991 |
| 030 | white hominy and tomato sauce | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1991 |
| 031 | fresh whole jalapenos, unprocessed black beans, lentils, red beans, garbanzos, and pinto beans | ABANDONED | Jun 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRICHARD, CHARLES E.
- Other trademarks owned by PRICHARD, CHARLES E.
- Other trademarks owned by La Corona Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named LA CORONA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1999 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |