USPTO serial 75012718
NETFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | blank analogue and digital carriers of data, sound and images; computer software for use in providing access to a global computer information network and in searching for information or data therein, for use in transmitting and receiving secure data, and for use in managing security functions, in connection with a global computer information network; computers, computer peripherals, servers, scanners, tapestreamers, data routers, data terminals, repeaters, modems, interconnects, gateways, and communication interfaces; interactive television systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | providing business information via a global computer network; providing and establishing a web site of business information; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications network | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others featuring a wide range of subject matter; providing information in the field of sports, culture, amusement, relaxation, and education in the field of global computer information networks, all via a global computer network; providing and establishing a web site of information in the field of computer education | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by STICHTING NEDERLAND NO. 1 OP DE ELECTRONISCHE SNELWEG
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NETFACE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |