USPTO serial 75012841
WETNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2427172Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2001
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WETNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sun Valley, CA
Universal City, CA
Universal City, CA
SUN VALLEY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Theodore S. Maceiko
Theodore S. Maceiko Maceiko IP3770 Highland Avenue, Suite 207Manhattan Beach, CA 90266UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | information services in the field of water fountain and water entertainment information, namely, specifications, design, engineering, maintenance and customization information, all rendered by means of a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WET ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WET ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WET ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WET
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named WETNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |