USPTO serial 75018493
ARMONIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3405818Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 2008
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARMONIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENCANTADORA POR NATURALEZA S.A.
VALLE, CO
ACOPI-YUMBO, CO
ACOPI-YUMBO, CO
Cali, CO
CARTAGENA, CO
ENCANTADORA POR NATURALEZA S.A.
VALLE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS E. SPATH
THOMAS E. SPATH ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's wear, namely, lingerie, [ sports bras, sleepwear, ] swim wear, [ T-shirts, caps, and beach costumes, namely, beach wear, beach cover-ups and beach dresses ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ENCANTADORA POR NATURALEZA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PUNTO SPORT LTDA.
- Other trademarks owned by PUNTO SPORT LTDA.
- Other trademarks owned by Tejidos de Punto Sport S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by C.I. OCEANOS S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by ENCANTADORA POR NATURALEZA S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ARMONIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |