USPTO serial 75020459
BLUE MAXX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENDERSON, CINDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BLUE MAXX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cobourg, Ontario, CA
Cobourg, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD A ARRETT
RICHARD S MEYER MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1800 M ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | insulated concrete wall form system comprised of wall components made of plastic webbing joining foam blocks of polystyrene, which form wall forms, and bracing and fitting members for supporting the wall forming prior to pouring the concrete, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training services, namely, training builders in the use of insulated concrete wall form systems and their application to specific construction projects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 9, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |