USPTO serial 75021873
KENT H. LANDSBERG CO. INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KENT H. LANDSBERG CO. INTEGRATED SYSTEMS GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montebello, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Pavitt, Jr.
WILLIAM H PAVITT JR BEEHLER & PAVITT100 CORPORATE POINTECULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | analyzing a manufacturer/client's market position and objectives; outlining and developing product marketing goals, and a plan to meet the manufacture/client's objectives; and, upon approval of the plan by the client, executing that plan, using state of the art solutions, including re-engineering the client's packaging systems, streamlining wherehouse systems, improving automatic data collections, bar coding, inventor tracking, labelling and product identification software | ABANDONED | Oct 26, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |