USPTO serial 75023338
FOOTLOOSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 609
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIGELL, CHARLES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOOTLOOSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn S. Bacal
GLENN S BACAL QUARLES & BRADYONE E CAMELBACK RDSTE 400PHOENIX, AZ 85012-1649Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | booking and arranging tours and excursions for tourists; providing tour guide services; conducting sightseeing tours for others; arranging travel tours; guided van and boat tour services; arranging for recreational services, namely, arranging ferry rides, canoe trips, whitewater rafting, kayaking, water taxi rides, gondola rides, boating, guided car tours, bike tours, horseback riding, whale watching tours, water-skiing, bungee jumping, sky diving, and parachuting; arranging for air transportation; airline reservation services; airline chartering services; chartering of vans; conducting camping expeditions; providing transportation reservation services | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1997 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |