USPTO serial 75024858
STEP BY STEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STEP BY STEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth B. Germain
KENNETH B GERMAIN FROST & JACOBSP O BOX 5715CINCINNATI, OH 45201-5715UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | foot and leg treatment products, namely, foot exfoliating scrubs, replenishing oils, foot and leg moisturizers, cooling gels and talcum powders | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | antiseptic sprays, foot disinfectants, sanitizers for professional use and therapeutic oils for foot and leg treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercantile Stores Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercantile Stores Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named STEP BY STEP
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 24, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |