USPTO serial 75026742
HOLLAND BROTHERS HANDMADE IN AMERICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLLAND BROTHERS HANDMADE IN AMERICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen S. Frank
KAREN S FRANK LEGAL STRATEGIES GRP5905 CHRISTIE AVEEMERYVILLE, CA 94608UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | luggage and travel bags | ACTIVE | Jan 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND, GUY R.
- Other trademarks owned by Holland Sport
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND BROTHERS
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND, JOHN M., IV
- Other trademarks owned by HOLLAND BROTHERS
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Similar marks named HOLLAND BROTHERS HANDMADE IN AMERICA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |