Drawing for FINE DINING FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING PLACES

USPTO serial 75026772

FINE DINING FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING PLACES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINE DINING FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING PLACES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant services, namely coffee cafe services featuring coffee and espresso beverages, baked goods, candy, sandwiches, soft drinks, carbonated water, fruit juices and bottled water; and for retail store services featuring ground and whole bean coffee, tea, cocoa and espresso beverages, fruit juices, bottled water, soft drinks and carbonated water, baked goods, sandwiches, coffee grinders, coffee makers, espresso machines, and housewaresABANDONEDApr 25, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 1997PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Oct 27, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 28, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 23, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance