USPTO serial 75028272
INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2245187Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 1999
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edina, MN
INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEMS, INC.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN
Other trademarks owned by INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEMS, INC.
IRVING, TX
Edina, MN
IRVING, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC D PAULSRUD
ERIC D PAULSRUD STINSON LEONARD STREET LLP150 S 5TH STREET, SUITE 2300STINSON TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing databases of information regarding advertisements for the products and services of others via a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 1995 |
| 041 | providing databases of information regarding education and entertainment for the products and productions of others, namely, producing and providing databases of information transforming local and national news, sports, weather, education, health, entertainment, advertising and lifestyle topics into online format for others for dissemination via a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 1995 |
| 042 | providing programming, advertising, producing and transmitting services for use on a global computer network, namely, designing, producing and providing home pages and web sites for others via a global computer information network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 20, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alpha Video & Audio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LAKANA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Alpha Video & Audio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by NEXSTAR DIGITAL LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named INTERNET BROADCASTING SYSTEM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 11, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 15, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 26, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 7, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 9, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 15, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1997 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |