USPTO serial 75029180
CANADIAN BOOSTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANADIAN BOOSTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1C3, CA
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1C3, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toiletries, hair care, personal care and body care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, hair gel, styling lotion, aftershave, hair tonic, hair dressing, hair cream, non-medicated dandruff preparation, facial mask, massage cream, cold cream, body talc, hair color restorer, shaving cream, and shaving oil | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 28, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 27, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |