USPTO serial 75029884
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LUNG PAO INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CO., LTD.
ROAD TOWN, TORTOLA, VG
Other trademarks owned by LUNG PAO INTERNATIONAL HOLDING CO., LTD.
GONZALEZ, ANDRES MIGUEL VALERO
Elche, ES
GONZALEZ, ANDRES MIGUEL VALERO
Elche, ES
ALICANTE, ES
Elche, ES
Elche, ES
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 THIRD AVENUENew York, NY 10017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | boots, shoes [ and slippers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 1998 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 22, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |