USPTO serial 75029922
TELEPRESENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TELEPRESENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Antonio, TX
San Antonio, TX
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic hardware and computer software, namely, multiplexers and software, used for accessing a remote office computer network, remote facsimile machine, and remote private branch exchange (PBX); electronic hardware and computer software for telecommuting; electronic hardware and computer software for enabling a remote user's telephone, connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN), to behave as a PBX extension of the user's office telephone system; electronic hardware and computer software to enable a user to connect to a computer network and receive incoming telephone calls with the use of a single telephone line without disconnecting from the computer network; electronic hardware and computer software enabling an incoming telephone call, traveling over a telephone line that is currently being used by the recipient, to ring all individual telephones at the recipient's home or office; electronic hardware and computer software to forward and route telephone calls directed to a user's office extension to a telephone at the user's home or some other remote location; and electronic hardware and computer software for forwarding and routing a user's electronic mail from one computer to another computer | ACTIVE | May 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 14, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |