USPTO serial 75031213
FLW TOUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2464046Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 26, 2001
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLW TOUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BENTON, KY
BENTON, KY
Minneapolis, MN
GILBERTSVILLE, KY
HOPKINS, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Flippin, AK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Johnston
Scott W. Johnston MERCHANT& GOULD P.C.P.O. BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FLW, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by OPERATION BASS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Genmar Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OPERATION BASS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROJECT MEDINA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Genmar Holdings, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by FLW TOUR, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FLW TOUR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 12, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 7, 2011 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 14, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |