Drawing for GUARANTEED DRY BASEMENTS TUFF-N-DRI

USPTO serial 75033057

GUARANTEED DRY BASEMENTS TUFF-N-DRI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2090533Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 26, 1997
Examiner
DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with GUARANTEED DRY BASEMENTS TUFF-N-DRI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001waterproofing sealant for below-grade concrete or masonry foundation wallsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2026REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jul 20, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 11, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 14, 2021A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Jun 3, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2021PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Feb 22, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 1, 2020ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Feb 18, 2020WDRLOTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION
Jan 21, 2020A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Oct 21, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 21, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2019EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2019PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7
Jun 13, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jun 1, 2019WDRLOTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION
Apr 18, 2019A7OKAMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
Apr 4, 2019APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Mar 7, 2019ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED
Sep 28, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Sep 28, 2017RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 28, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 28, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 23, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Aug 26, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jan 27, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 26, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2008MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Sep 19, 2007RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 19, 200789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 12, 2007PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Aug 27, 200789AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED
Aug 27, 2007E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Mar 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 11, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2003C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Dec 16, 2002815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 26, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 14, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 9, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance