USPTO serial 75033206
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Augustine, FL
St. Augustine, FL
ST. AUGUSTINE, FL
WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC.
BURBANK, CA
New York, NY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | T-shirts, caps, sweatshirts, jackets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 7, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 1, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |