USPTO serial 75033250
PCTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PCTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | broadcast network components, namely, circuit modules that interface with a network for carrying digital signals to be transmitted to a group of computer terminals, and computer software which controls the circuit modules and/or which causes creation of digital signals that pass through the circuit modules for controlling computer terminals connected to the network | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing a broadcast network serving as a transmission path for digital signals, supplied by others, to a group of computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |