Drawing for BREVE BAR

USPTO serial 75034085

BREVE BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BREVE BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID M LANDAU

SUSAN L HELLER HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK &RABKINTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR SEVENTH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail store services featuring ground and whole bean coffee; tea; cocoa; coffee and espresso beverages and beverages made with a base of coffee, espresso, and/or milk; spices, powdered flavorings; flavoring syrups; baked goods, including muffins, scones, biscuits, cookies, pastries, cakes and breads, and ready-to-make mixes of the same; packaged foods; sandwiches and prepared foods; chocolate and confectionery items; granola; dried fruits; spreads; juices; soft drinks; electric appliances, namely, kettles, coffee makers, espresso makers and coffee grinders; housewares, non-electric appliances and related items, namely, hand operated coffee grinders and coffee mills, insulated coffee and beverage cups (made of metal, plastics and/or ceramics), collapsible cup carriers and caddies, non-paper coasters, insulated vacuum bottles, coffee cups, tea cups and mugs, glassware, dishes, plates and bowls, trivets, storage canisters, non-electric drip coffee makers and non-electric plunger-style coffee makers; paper and non paper coffee filters; furniture; clocks; toys; books; musical recordings; restaurant, cafe and coffee house servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 1998ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 2, 1998OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 2, 1998OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 19, 1997OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 5, 1997OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 15, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 2, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance