USPTO serial 75034742
SOUTH BEACH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2001
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOUTH BEACH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
AVENTURA, FL
ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Sutton
PAUL J SUTTON GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | ceiling fans without lights, electric coffee makers for domestic use, hand held electric hair dryers, electric steamers for clothing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SALACUSE, FRANK
- Other trademarks owned by ST. ROSE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named SOUTH BEACH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |