USPTO serial 75035153
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automatic transmission valve body components, namely, separator plates and springs; automatic transmission valve body parts sold as a unit for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions; and valve body kits comprising separator plates and springs for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 1995 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |