Drawing for TRANSGO PERFORMANCE SHIFT KIT

USPTO serial 75035153

TRANSGO PERFORMANCE SHIFT KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSGO PERFORMANCE SHIFT KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012automatic transmission valve body components, namely, separator plates and springs; automatic transmission valve body parts sold as a unit for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissions; and valve body kits comprising separator plates and springs for installation in the valve bodies of vehicle automatic transmissionsABANDONEDNov 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 25, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 20, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Mar 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 13, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 29, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 5, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 28, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Apr 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 7, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 20, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 5, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance