USPTO serial 75036808
GREEN FIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN FIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHAO-PO WU
153 AMBERWOOD DRWALNUT, CA 91789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fish, namely, canned sardines, mackerel and squid; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, namely, mango, pineapple, mustard green, cabbage, and garlic; milk, namely, coconut milk; edible oils and fats, namely, bottled vegetable oils such as peasnut and corn oils | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | tea, cocoa, rice, tapioca, sago, and coffee substitutes; sugar, namely, rock sugar; flour; honey, treacle; ingredients for food preparation, namely, salt, mustard, pepper, vinegar, tomato sauces, and spices such as sliced garlic or garlic powder | ABANDONED | — |
| 031 | agricultural products and grains not included in other classes, namely, pure fruit juice such as pineapple juice, coconut juice, peach juice, plum juice, and malt; fresh fruits and vegetables, namely, mango, ginger, and garlic | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |